Mumford & Sons
‘Babel’ (Island)
In the three years since ‘Sigh No More’, Mumford & Sons have supersized. They’ve played for the President at an intimate White House reception. Their frontman has married a Hollywood A-lister. All the while, album sales have continued at a speed that would wear out even the hardiest of Amazon warehouse forklift trucks. ‘Sigh No More’ – a BRIT winner, if you remember – has gone four times platinum on these shores and twice platinum in the United States. Impressive for a folk band and astonishing when we’re forever told that nobody buys albums. However, there comes a point where all this success stops being astonishing and starts seeming unfathomable. In fact, it’s at an exact point: it’s when you press play. Predictably enough, ‘Babel’ is like its forebear, an album of grandiose folk music delivered by four men who look like they’ve been napping in a hay bale since 1887. It is an album of stomping hoedowns and widdling banjos, while sticking with each banal plod to the end yields yet-another barn-sized crescendo. Effectively, it is emo for Blacksmiths.
This would all be semi-tolerable, were it not for the sickeningly overwrought poetry bobbing on top. Lyrically, Marcus Mumford’s words are so hackneyed they could be considered an extension of the London borough itself. Throughout, walls “come tumbling down”, while he froths about “seeing the light”, casts promises to “wait for you”, and admits to being “lost” so often we’re considering buying him a Sat Nav (we won’t, though – he’d probably decry it as Witchcraft). Regardless, Mumford & Sons’ ongoing ascent is assured. After all, they’ve already survived the most potent threat to their supremacy: a public endorsement from a Conservative Prime Minister. At this point, not even a Kevlar-plated, multi-caterpillar- tracked Adele-shaped assault tank could stop them. They’re indestructible.

Robbie McBride
21 Sep 2012 1:31pm"Effectively, it is emo for Blacksmiths" – Topper.
Robbie McBride
21 Sep 2012 1:31pm"Effectively, it is emo for Blacksmiths" – Topper.
Robbie McBride
21 Sep 2012 1:31pm"Effectively, it is emo for Blacksmiths" – Topper.
Robbie McBride
21 Sep 2012 1:31pm"Effectively, it is emo for Blacksmiths" – Topper.
Ben Whelan
25 Sep 2012 10:31pmis this a review of the album?
Danny de Groot
02 Oct 2012 11:49pmFunny how every review who rate this album very low, aren't really reviews. They're little hate trips on Mumford & Sons, who apparently have done some people very wrong.
Also funny how Mumford & Sons are to those people apparently also the only band who can't make two albums musically similair in style. Unlike… no wait; just like every other band does.
Spiteful hypocrites.
Danny de Groot
02 Oct 2012 11:49pmFunny how every review who rate this album very low, aren't really reviews. They're little hate trips on Mumford & Sons, who apparently have done some people very wrong.
Also funny how Mumford & Sons are to those people apparently also the only band who can't make two albums musically similair in style. Unlike… no wait; just like every other band does.
Spiteful hypocrites.
Robbie McBride
03 Oct 2012 12:08pm | In reply to Danny de GrootImagine, listening to albums and reviewing them for a living, you'd hear so much great music… and then get to this album… after having such a wide catalogue to compare it to, i trust this reviewer is correct in their analyses, it's just awful music
Robbie McBride
03 Oct 2012 12:08pm | In reply to Danny de GrootImagine, listening to albums and reviewing them for a living, you'd hear so much great music… and then get to this album… after having such a wide catalogue to compare it to, i trust this reviewer is correct in their analyses, it's just awful music
David Weare
06 Oct 2012 10:49pmI think as a group of people they're probably dicks. Like most people.
But I can't denie that I like it when the banjo goes fast.
I'm going to buy a banjo. Then it doesn't matter what you sing..really.
Jonathan R Reynolds
09 Oct 2012 6:02amThis is considered a review? There's no analysis of any of the songs nor of the band itself, with only one sentence of hinting upon the critic actually listening to the album. There is only a lack of evidence to support biased and puerile remarks skating upon bigotry. If this is what a review is, I think I should look into becoming a "critic".
George Moujaes
15 Oct 2012 8:12am | In reply to Jonathan R ReynoldsDude, he did not like the album and wrote two paragraphs adequately. Just shut up.
George Moujaes
15 Oct 2012 8:12am | In reply to Jonathan R ReynoldsDude, he did not like the album and wrote two paragraphs adequately. Just shut up.
George Moujaes
15 Oct 2012 8:12am | In reply to Jonathan R ReynoldsDude, he did not like the album and wrote two paragraphs adequately. Just shut up.